How Do You Run a Shop in a Neighborhood with No Cash?
19 March 2009 at 04:03 Julie Ross 5 comments
I’ve always been curious about what happens when microfinance clients open businesses in places where there is very little capital. Many operate small shops of household necessities but the placement of such stores is generally based more on proximity to home than a strategic evaluation of which part of town is most profitable. So how do they cope if their customers can’t afford to buy anything? Last week, I got my answer: credit.

Pen and Paper: How to issue credit, the old fashioned way
I was in the field with the Kiva Coordinator, John, collecting journals. We were meeting with a client who sells vegetables in a small neighborhood in Kigali, Rwanda. After a series of preliminary questions, I asked the client if he was having any difficulties with his business.
“Creditors,” was the translation I received for his answer.
I paused, trying to re-translate it into something that would make sense. I couldn’t quite guess what he meant, so I just asked. Without going back to the client for more of an explanation, John expanded upon the client’s assertion,
“His customers owe him money but they’re not paying.”
Ahh so he may mean “debtors,” in which case this microfinance client is both a credit-receiver and a credit-giver. Could it be? People always speak about Africa’s cash only economy and I have yet to meet a Rwandese with a credit card so it hadn’t occurred to me that there was a widespread grassroots credit system sans plastic. I shared my surprise with the Kiva Coordinator who gave me the dreaded answer:
“You didn’t know that! Everyone knows that!”
“No one ever told me!” I exclaimed in my defense.
“That’s because it’s so obvious!” John countered. Touché.
Apparently, small shopkeepers all over Rwanda accept credit in the form of an IOU from their customers. If I was going to be the last to know (did all of you already know this?) I wanted to at least fully understand it, so I dove in. What John and the client explained is that most of his customers are regulars. They live nearby and he knows them well. A lot of them don’t have cash in the middle of the month but they still need vegetables so he keeps a record of what they have purchased and at the end of the month he presents them with their tab. He keeps careful records to know exactly how much each customer owes him. When I asked to see the records, he produced three notebooks with pages and pages filled with customers’ bills.

Here, one page of his careful notes of what his customers owe
Lately, he says people aren’t paying. Unfortunately, he doesn’t feel that he can stop accepting credit. If he did, “he wouldn’t sell anything,” John explained. But how does he ensure repayment? How can he get the money if his neighbors insist there is none? He didn’t seem to have an answer. The difficulty with grassroots credit, I suppose, is that there are not systems to ensure that the creditor is ever paid. He could refuse to sell to his customers until they pay, but then they could go to another vendor. He could employ some sort of social pressure since he is based in a small community and try to make it a social taboo not to pay, but if many people in the community are in the same position, that won’t necessarily work.
I don’t have a good solution as to how to get the client his money. We all talk a fair amount about the principle of credit and debt. We debate whether it is wise to purchase things if you don’t have the money to do so. As a shopper myself, I have attempted not to purchase goods on credit unless I knew I would have the money to pay for them at the end of the month. So are this client’s customers wrong to buy vegetables when they’re not sure if they can afford it? If he stopped accepting credit, sales would decrease because clients couldn’t afford the goods or because there would only be a few days each month that they could. The credit keeps his sales more constant which from a stocking perspective is wise in a perishable goods market. But if his customers are buying without knowing if or when they can pay, then credit isn’t being used properly. For me, a large credit card company would be the victim and they would ultimately sock it to me through large fees. Unfortunately, this client doesn’t have that kind of leverage. So what’s the solution? Is there a scenario in which he can keep his business profitable in a neighborhood where customers can’t pay?
If you’d like to see all of Vision Finance Company’s currently fundraising loans, click here. To join Kiva’s Vision Finance Company lending team and to support Kiva’s Rwandese entrepreneurs, click here.
Julie Ross is currently serving as a Kiva Fellow at Vision Finance Company in Rwanda. In December she completed her first placement with BRAC Tanzania.
Entry filed under: Africa, KF5 (Kiva Fellows 5th Class), KF7 (Kiva Fellows 7th Class), Rwanda, Vision Finance Company s.a. (VFC), a partner of World Vision International. Tags: Julie Ross, Kiva, Kiva Fellows, microfinance, Rwanda, Vision Finance Company.


1. howard | 21 March 2009 at 05:57
One unfortunate conclusion to consider in this case is that the business is not viable. I mean, the product cannot be stored (its perishable), it often cannot be sold for cash (the customer often doesn’t have cash), the credit risk cannot be properly calculated (there is no way of knowing if the credit debt can be collected), and group pressure for collection cannot be applied (too many who would apply the pressure are in the same boat as the defaulter). This entrepreneur is running a charity that wants to be a business.
2. Julie Ross | 20 March 2009 at 01:43
Interesting points, guys! It does make more sense to accept credit on non-exhaustible goods, and charging more to credit customers is logical. One of the problems I’ve seen with profit in general is that competition is so high between shops selling identical merchandise that market rate barely exceeds that which the shopkeeper originally paid, earning minimal profit on each good. I worry that the competitive market would make credit premiums impossible since one shopkeeper would likely woo the others’ customers by charging no premium.
I don’t really have any answers, but I’m interested in all of your perspectives on this. Have others seen credit at work in small shops in other parts of the world? Are shopkeepers generally able to collect? If so, are there any particular methods that generate a better rate of repayment?
3. jnlchervin | 20 March 2009 at 00:41
Abby,
What your Senegalese colleague says makes sense, in theory. However, if the money is not going to be recovered anyway, charging a premium to those with a credit line won’t accomplish much. The only way that would work is if the recoveries across the board were sufficient to make up for the debts of the delinquent shoppers. It would seem that the entrepreneur would have to raise prices across the board in order to guarantee (some) flows to cover his costs. But that may drive others away. Again, not an easy puzzle to solve.
I wonder if the shopkeeper has any kind of competitive advantage—is he the sole local stockist of any kind of good? If so, what if he refused to extend credit on that good? Chances are, if he’s the only stockist, he may be able to charge slightly more for that good anyway (again, assuming there is sufficient demand at that price). Just a thought.
4. Unilove | 19 March 2009 at 20:26
So, if he sells on credit and does not get paid, he is out both the money and the merchandise. If he does not sell, at least he has the merchandise. However, since the goods are perishable, they will rot, doing no one any good.
Maybe he should try another line of work? Hunger is such a basic need, that to refuse goods to a neighbor seems cruel. However, if he had a taxi (just for example), the need is more optional and more easily refused if there is no immediate payment at hand.
Interesting puzzle….
5. abbygray | 19 March 2009 at 08:08
Hey Julie! I’m sitting at my MFI next to my Senegalese colleague, and I asked her if the borrowers who sell things on credit charge interest. She says no, but that they charge a premium for things sold on credit. So, its like interest, in a way – the increased price helps cover the risk of selling things on credit.
Apparently here in Senegal they only sell stuff like shoes, refrigerators, etc on credit – not edible things like veggies.
Just adding another piece to your puzzle!
Godspeed,
Abby