Religious Tradition or Financial Burden?

3 March 2010 at 19:22 5 comments

By Nick Lewis
Kiva Fellows 10th Class–Bali, Indonesia

As you drive through the small village of Blimbingsari in northwest Bali, you immediately notice two things; the first is that this is a Christian village, of note because Bali is 94% Hindu, 5% Muslim and only 1% Christian. In fact, this is the largest Christian community in Bali. The second thing you notice is that the homes in Blimbingsari appear to be in much better condition than those of neighboring villages. They are all brick or cement, have ceramic-tile roofs and attractive paint-jobs, and many even have flower gardens in front, while those in adjacent villages often have mud floors and are of thatch construction in various states of disrepair.

On a recent visit to the branch office of Koperasi Mitra Usaha Kecil, I asked Kiva Coordinator Pak Zeruya Lesmana why the difference between housing in Blimbingsari and the neighboring villages was so dramatic. “I don’t know for sure,” he said, “but I think maybe it is because the other villages are Hindu so they must use their money for ceremonies.” I have been living on Bali now for five months and have grown very accustom to seeing the Balinese Hindus of the region on their way to various temples and ceremonies, but never did I think that this might somehow be a financial burden. Balinese Hindus have regular ceremonies at numerous temples around their homes and work. Some temples are associated with an individual family compound while others are associated with a rice field, a farm or a business. Balinese Hindus place offerings at these temples on a monthly, weekly or sometimes daily basis. There are also very large ceremonies that take place approximately every six months and require more elaborate ceremonies and thus are more expensive.

After this conversation I asked a few Kiva borrowers about the financial implications these ceremonies have on them and their families. Wayan Winarti, who works as a travelling food saleswoman, says that it is not too much of a burden for her. Each day she purchases 400,000 IDR (approximately $40) worth of instant noodles and snacks and then travels on her motorbike to smaller villages and hamlets and sells them. On a good day, she can make as much as 90,000 IDR (appx. $9) in profit. With this money, she says she can easily afford the 4000 IDR ($0.40) she spends each day on offerings and has no trouble saving up for the larger 500,000 IDR ($50) offerings required of her every six months. Ni Nengah Ngalis, on the other hand, says that the offerings are burdensome given her financial standing. She sells palm sugar and can only make $2 per day in profit. Ni Nengah can only afford to make a weekly offering that costs her approximately $0.70, and must carefully save her money to afford the larger ceremonies. Given the significance of these ceremonies, both religiously and socially, neither woman admits to wishing they could stop paying for the required offerings, but it is clear that the financial obligations are burdensome for some. While I in no way intend to question the value or significance of these ceremonies, one must question whether the money spent on daily offerings and ceremonies would be better spent on food, education or housing needs. This is a question of faith and philosophy that goes far beyond this forum, but I would be interested in hearing your comments.

To learn more about our Balinese community and Kiva partner Mitra Usaha Kecil through monthly email updates, please join the brand new lending team: Friends of Mitra Usaha Kecil.

Entry filed under: blogsherpa, Dian Bhuana Lestari Foundation (Dinari), Indonesia, KF10 (Kiva Fellows 10th Class). Tags: , , , , , , , , , .

More on the “guy behind the guy” Kiva partners become Kiva lenders

5 Comments Add your own

  • [...] where you can observe a lot of chaos and reasons for inconvenience, religion is obvious everywhere. Every religion is extremely prominent in daily life and I dare to state that for most Indonesians there is no part of life that is not influenced by [...]

    Reply
  • 2. Kati Mayfield  |  5 March 2010 at 11:58

    Great post, Nick! You’re right that this is a big question that may not have a definitive answer. As Amartya Sen says, though, development is freedom, and he includes social inclusion as a type of freedom. It seems like some of these Mitra Usaha Kecil clients are bound and burdened by what the social norms require of them. On the other hand, they seem to shoulder these religious “burdens” proudly, to achieve the social “peace of mind” that Sidetrips mentioned. For me the key lies in the amount of choice they have. If Wayan Winarti, because of her loan and because of responsible management of her finances, can easily comply with the expected 4000 IDR/day and the additional 500,000 IDR/month, maybe she can choose to spend even more on offerings; simultaneously proving her financial stability and her piety.

    Reply
  • 3. Kati Mayfield  |  5 March 2010 at 11:58

    Great post, Nick! You’re right that this is a big question that may not have a definitive answer. As Amartya Sen says, though, development is freedom, and he includes social inclusion as a type of freedom. It seems like some of these Mitra Usaha Kecil clients are bound and burdened by what the social norms require of them. On the other hand, they seem to shoulder these religious “burdens” proudly, to achieve the social “peace of mind” that Sidetrips mentioned. For me the key lies in the amount of choice they have. If Wayan Winarti, because of her loan and because of responsible managment of her finances, can easily comply with the expected 4000 IDR/day and the additional 500,000 IDR/month, maybe she can choose to spend even more on offerings; simultaneously proving her financial stability and her piety.

    Reply
  • 4. Fehmeen  |  5 March 2010 at 06:34

    Often, the poor have no choice over spending extravagantly on religious ceremonies because of strong social pressures. While it may not be an issue for slightly better off people, it’s often not the case for the poorest of the poor

    Reply
  • 5. sidetrips  |  4 March 2010 at 21:31

    It could be a question of something more basic. Members of a tight-knit society who meet certain expectations are then free to live their lives. If they refuse, then their lives in that society will be troubled. Having the extra money for food, education, or housing may hardly be worth it. For many people in many societies, it is far more beneficial to be accepted by others before meeting one’s own needs. The benefits of meeting societal expectations might be entirely intangible, such as freedom from fear or anxiety or guilt, any of which can undermine one’s whole life if not allayed. The resulting peace of mind and certain freedoms in life might be the unconscious calculation many people make.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Get Involved!

Learn more about this blog and about Kiva Fellows

Visit Kiva.org

Apply to be a Kiva Fellow

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 315 other followers

Archives

Drawing from the Field

Kiva Blog Policy


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 315 other followers